Hi
Marty,
Appreciate the comments.
I don't
believe anyone is suggesting or will suggest we change our policy based on
Ms. Froetscher's suggestion. I certainly am not. I was very pleased to see her
comment that NSC's pursuit would be based on factual, scientific evidence
and none suggested there was an issue related to amateur
radio.
I do
believe, though, that promoting safety in all of our activities is something we
must continue to do. A side note along those lines - I was pleased to
see the recent short QST article on tower safety. While not related to the
specific topic at hand, I believe we have a responsibility as the national
organization to promote safety in all of our amateur radio activities, as we
have done many times in the past.
I do
agree with her, regardless of an individual's ability to multi-task, that
performing any activity while operating a motor vehicle that could distract from
the primary objective (in this case, operating a motor vehicle) does contain
some risk. Of course, that equally applies to any activity you are performing
and especially activities related to amateur radio (tower work, working on the
high voltage supply for the big amp, etc.!)
73 Joel
W5ZN
-----Original
Message-----
From: Marty Woll <n6vi@socal.rr.com>
To: arrl-odv
<arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 2:45
am
Subject: [arrl-odv:18077] Re:National Safety Council reply
Hi, Joel.
While I'm pleased to learn that NSC is not looking to
promote laws prohibiting Amateur Radio mobile operation any time soon, I'm not
sure that discouraging mobile operation other than in "disaster emergencies" is
consistent with our - or at least my constituents' - position on the use of
Amateur equipment while driving. Some people can multi-task well and
others cannot. A blanket policy along the lines suggested by Ms.
Froetscher is, IMHO, not a suitable substitute for the exercise of
individual judgment and would be inapproriate.
73,
Marty N6VI
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:18
PM
Subject: FW: National Safety Council
reply