Greg, K0GWRiley,At one point, there was talk that all existing OOs would need to be re-qualified, take some training and a test, and some would not be invited to continue. I don't know if that's still in the cards, but if so, I think it is appropriate that OOCs be warned about this possibility. Starting and stopping again, whether or not for good reason, would not improve our relationship to OOs. If this "re-qualification" is no longer on the table, I agree that resuming appointments is a good idea.
73,On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:54 AM, RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH <rilepatholling@comcast.net> wrote:Does anyone have any objection to resuming the appointment of OO's as needed, until the FCC meets with us on the new agreement? That will probably be within a few months, i.e., as soon as they get out the three major cases they are working on now in our service.
I recommend that we resume the appointments.______________________________On April 5, 2018 at 2:16 PM "Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote:
Hi gang:
I’ve appointed Riley Hollingsworth, K4ZDH, as Chair of the OO Program Study Committee to replace Brian who is rolling off. I’ve also appointed Bob Vallio to serve on the Committee.
I appreciate Riley stepping up to the plate to take the reins.73Rick – K5UR
..._________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv