I never even was told where it was during my director orientation. I had to find it myself. It seems below the lowest of priority. Ria N2RJ On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:12 PM James R. Schilling <kg4jsz@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
I have been asking about it being updated since January. The last I was told, it would get updated after the mid-year meeting. This after I was told it would be updated after the January meeting.
It does not appear to be a priority.
Jim Schilling, KG4JSZ
Vice Director – Southeastern Division
*Serving ARRL members in **Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.*
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/KG4JSZ/
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net> wrote:
The more I dig into ARRL governance documents, the larger my headache becomes. It's all mind numbing.
I was reviewing the current ARRL Travel Policy contained within the Director Workbook, Section 7.2, as published on our website today and noticed it doesn't appear that Standing Order 16-1.38 ever got incorporated into the document as approved.
Website (http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/Section%207.pdf ):
"Directors -- Travel within their own Division is at the discretion of each Director. Travel to neighboring Divisions on official ARRL business shall be coordinated with and approved by the President, with advance notification to the Director of the Division being visited"
Standing Order: "16-1.38) Section 7.2 of the ARRL Travel Policy is amended as follows: Directors – Travel within their own Division is at the discretion of each Director. Travel to neighboring Divisions on official ARRL business shall be coordinated with advance notification to the Director of the Division being visited. Division budgets may be used for travel on official ARRL business to the Dayton Hamvention, extending stays at headquarters and making an additional trip annually to Headquarters for those Directors serving on committees that do not hold four meetings a year there."
Was this document never meant to be updated, since the revision appears as a stand-alone Standing Order? If not, shouldn't there be a reference to the overriding Standing Order in the Travel Policy document?
73; Mike W7VO
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv