Dave, This is good to know. Will this also be communicated to the Section Managers for them to be aware as well for their own local section websites? - Bill N3LLR -----Original Message----- From: "Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ" <dsumner@arrl.org> Subj: [arrl-odv:13972] Prohibited Election Year Activities Date: Wed Apr 5, 2006 9:36 am Size: 6K To: "arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> The IRS has issued a fact sheet that explains what section 501(c)(3) organizations such as the ARRL need to do, and not do, to comply with the federal tax law during political campaigns. The entire fact sheet is available at http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=154712,00.html. Here are the excerpts that are the most significant to the ARRL. Note particularly the section on Web sites, which must be observed by everyone who maintains a Web site on behalf of an ARRL division or section. David Sumner, K1ZZ Chief Executive Officer, ARRL The Prohibition on Political Campaign Intervention Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to all campaigns including campaigns at the federal, state and local level. Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. What is Political Campaign Intervention? Political campaign intervention includes any and all activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention. Distributing statements prepared by others that favor or oppose any candidate for public office will also violate the prohibition. Allowing a candidate to use an organization's assets or facilities will also violate the prohibition if other candidates are not given an equivalent opportunity. Individual Activity by Organization Leaders The political campaign intervention prohibition is not intended to restrict free expression on political matters by leaders of organizations speaking for themselves, as individuals. Nor are leaders prohibited from speaking about important issues of public policy. However, for their organizations to remain tax exempt under section 501(c)(3), leaders cannot make partisan comments in official organization publications or at official functions of the organization. To avoid potential attribution of their comments outside of organization functions and publications, organization leaders who speak or write in their individual capacity are encouraged to clearly indicate that their comments are personal and not intended to represent the views of the organization. Issue Advocacy vs. Political Campaign Intervention Under federal tax law, section 501(c)(3) organizations may take positions on public policy issues, including issues that divide candidates in an election for public office. However, section 501(c)(3) organizations must avoid any issue advocacy that functions as political campaign intervention. Even if a statement does not expressly tell an audience to vote for or against a specific candidate, an organization delivering the statement is at risk of violating the political campaign intervention prohibition if there is any message favoring or opposing a candidate. A statement can identify a candidate not only by stating the candidate's name but also by other means such as showing a picture of the candidate, referring to political party affiliations, or other distinctive features of a candidate's platform or biography. All the facts and circumstances need to be considered to determine if the advocacy is political campaign intervention. Key factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following: * Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office; * Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval for one or more candidates' positions and/or actions; * Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election; * Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election; * Whether the issue addressed in the communication has been raised as an issue distinguishing candidates for a given office; * Whether the communication is part of an ongoing series of communications by the organization on the same issue that are made independent of the timing of any election; and * Whether the timing of the communication and identification of the candidate are related to a non-electoral event such as a scheduled vote on specific legislation by an officeholder who also happens to be a candidate for public office. Web Sites The Internet has become a widely used communications tool. Section 501(c)(3) organizations use their own web sites to disseminate statements and information. They also routinely link their web sites to web sites maintained by other organizations as a way of providing additional information that the organizations believe is useful or relevant to the public. A web site is a form of communication. If an organization posts something on its web site that favors or opposes a candidate for public office, the organization will be treated the same as if it distributed printed material, oral statements or broadcasts that favored or opposed a candidate. An organization has control over whether it establishes a link to another site. When an organization establishes a link to another web site, the organization is responsible for the consequences of establishing and maintaining that link, even if the organization does not have control over the content of the linked site. Because the linked content may change over time, an organization may reduce the risk of political campaign intervention by monitoring the linked content and adjusting the links accordingly. Links to candidate-related material, by themselves, do not necessarily constitute political campaign intervention. The IRS will take all the facts and circumstances into account when assessing whether a link produces that result. The facts and circumstances to be considered include, but are not limited to, the context for the link on the organization's web site, whether all candidates are represented, any exempt purpose served by offering the link, and the directness of the links between the organization's web site and the web page that contains material favoring or opposing a candidate for public office. _____