So everyone understands, ARRL's "news organization" is Rick Lindquist. He does the research, writing, editing and posting. In this case, the story that Mr Fields is taking issue with is borrowed from a July story we ran, based on (and attributed to) the
ARDC news release regarding the sale of the IP addresses. Rick does not have time to do independent research on every story we run. I have passed Mr Fields comments on to Rick and he will reply directly to Mr Fields.
73, Howard, WB2ITX
I believe he’s also filing some official complaints with the CA AG as well.
RiaN2RJ
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:26 PM Greg Sarratt <gsarratt@att.net> wrote:
Mr. Fields has also complained to ARISS on this subject. He lives in Florida and I've heard his name tied to other complaints in the past.
73,Greg, W4OZK
Dear ODV,
This was forwarded to me by Bryan Fields, W9CR, the former technical coordinator of ARDC, who resigned because of this sale.
It is in regard to a story we ran about the sale of IP addresses by ARDC.
73Ria, N2RJ
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Date: Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 6:17 PM
Subject: ARRL "News" of ARDC grant.
To: Jairam, Ria <rjairam@gmail.com>
Regarding this article, I have to ask, does the ARRL have any journalistic
interrogatory in it's news department?
> http://www.arrl.org/news/amateur-radio-digital-communications-announces-grant-to-ariss
This article states ARDC sold off unused IP addresses, this is not the case,
they were in active use. The IP's sold were for non-US use, but this was sold
to benefit only US users.
No one questioned ARDC for the amount they received, or questioned their
intent for keeping it secret. Amazon was the buyer, why not state this?
ARDC is not the owner of these IP address, merely the custodian of them. ARDC
was established in 2011, a full 30 years after the grant was made to "amateur
radio digital communications" in RFC790
There is no mention of the three active complaints with ARIN regarding this
fraudulent transaction.
Had your reporters consulted even Wikipedia, some much needed questions could
be asked. This is shirking the responsibility of being a news source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMPRNet
This entire article reads like the ARRL is condoning the behavior of ARDC.
It's the view of many in the community that ARDC is acting in bad faith, and
likely is in violation of the laws, and policies of the University of
California. The ARRL news organization has a responsibility to let people
know the disputes regarding this this funding and the several formal fraud
complaints pending against it. This is so anyone in a position to accept an
ARDC grant can make a judgement.
I would appreciate a response and follow up from the ARRL news organization in
this matter.
Thank you,
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
______________________________________________________________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
-- Howard E. Michel, WB2ITX Chief Executive Officer ARRL, The National Association for Amateur Radio® 225 Main Street, Newington, CT 06111-1494 USA Telephone: +1 860-594-0404 email: hmichel@arrl.org