Hi, Harold.
 
As one who completed all three levels of EC several years ago, I think Joyce's idea is a great one, and I didn't read it as requiring a new on-line course.  Why couldn't the update material be put into print and sold as a stand-alone publication?  With our small-run publishing resources, it shouldn't be too expensive, and the knowledge / content is already in hand.  Failing that, the info could be put into the members-only Web site for all graduates to access.
 
73,
 
Marty
 
Marty Woll N6VI
Vice-Director, ARRL Southwestern Division
ADEC, ARES-LAX-NW
BCUL 15, LAFD ACS
CERT
----- Original Message -----
From: Kramer, Harold, WJ1B
To: arrl-odv
Cc: arrl-odv
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:22 AM
Subject: [arrl-odv:17121] RE: [arrl-odv:17117]

Joyce,

 

Sorry for the delayed response.  I wanted to get my facts straight.  You make an excellent point and we are asked this question a lot.  Anyone can re-take a course at the regular rate if they believe it would benefit them.  However, we do not offer a refresher course at a special rate for two reasons:

 

            First, CTDLC, our course vendor/platform charges us the same software license fee for every enrollment, new or old;

 

Second, our IT infrastructure has no provision for an additional rate or course level.  Jon would have to create it.  The system is very kluged up now between CTDLC and our Web site so adding anything else is very difficult.

 

 

73,

 

Harold

 

           

 

Harold Kramer, WJ1B

Chief Operating Officer

 

ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio

860 594 0220

hkramer@arrl.org

 


From: Joyce Birmingham [mailto:joyce@sabbi-us.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:12 PM
To: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:17117] RE: [arrl-odv:17114] ARRL Emergency Communications Level 3 Course to be Revised

 

Are there any plans for those who have already taken and passed this or any level, for that matter, to refresh ourselves and be aware of the new items that are introduced in the updated versions? If there have been significant changes in Federal Gov't programs and policies, as you have said, then perhaps these changes would warrant a 'refresher' (just addressing the changes), so that a 'new' graduate of a level is not 'on a different' page from those of us who have completed the courses in prior years.

 

Joyce KA2ANF

-----Original Message-----