Dear Officers, Directors and Vice Directors, Several issues have been raised. While they are related, they are not the same. Regarding Mr. Fusaro's post, I discussed this with him. He thought that, as a ham, he was supporting the ARRL's position and had every right to do so. He was careful to not identity himself as an ARRL employee and he used his personal email, not his arrl.org email. But we also discussed that his position is visible, and could be easily associated with ARRL. I advised him that in his new position he should consider not speaking out. Regarding the Board authorizing employees to make public statements, there is nothing in our Employee Handbook that prohibits employees from talking and posting opinions on any social media platform, so seeking permission should not be expected. Regarding the Employee Handbook, it was last modified on March 2017. If the Board wishes to create a social medial policy, staff can assist you in doing so. As Director Jairam has suggested, this policy should take into consideration the grade level of the employee. We might want to directly consider an employee's visibility to the public, for example, staff listed in QST could be a determining factor, or we could look at a grade level or job title. I would suggest that we not have an all encompassing policy, for example, to include interns and part time employees, but that clearly is a Board decision. As a point to note, the employee handbook explicitly states we can, at our sole discretion, modify it at any time and without notice, and nothing contained in the handbook limits ARRL's right as an at will employer. 73, Howard, WB2ITX On 03/19/2019 4:18 PM, Bellows, Jay, K0QB (Intl Affairs VP) wrote: My point was two-fold: I believe it is generally better to have the facts first. Secondly, assuming there was a violation of staff policy, though that has not been established, this would be a personnel and administrative matter. If it should subsequently be determined that there is a need for a policy change the Board may desire to act. I believe this approach is consistent with the approach set forth in the Guidebook for Directors of Nonprofit Corporations previously distributed to all members of the Board. 73, Jay, KØQB From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org><mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of rjairam@gmail.com<mailto:rjairam@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 2:14 PM To: jbellows@skypoint.com<mailto:jbellows@skypoint.com> Cc: arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Subject: [arrl-odv:28049] Re: Regarding The Filing of Comments to RM-11828 By An ARRL Employee Generally as a condition of employment in my experience, public statements concerning an employer by employees is restricted as a matter of policy since it could be interpreted as an official statement from the company. It also directly correlated to the position one holds. IIRC, Fusaro’s title is “director of operations.” As such public statements concerning ARRL policy or FCC petitions could be interpreted as being the opinion of the ARRL as it comes from a senior manager with the title “director.” That’s the major problem I have with it. As for the venue, it is what it is. I think bringing this to the board and asking the CEO to address the board on this is entirely appropriate as the comment concerns a public action. 73 Ria N2RJ On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:36 PM <jbellows@skypoint.com<mailto:jbellows@skypoint.com>> wrote: If the question was truly for CEO Michel it is interesting that you chose to address it on ODV rather than directly with him. Are asking if an ARRL employee is precluded from expressing his or her views in an FCC individual comment to a Rule Making proceeding as a condition of employment or suggesting an ARRL employee may only comment if permitted by the ARRL Board? Jay, KØQB From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org>> On Behalf Of John Robert Stratton Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 12:51 PM To: arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>; Michel, Howard, WB2ITX (CEO) <wb2itx@arrl.org<mailto:wb2itx@arrl.org>> Subject: [arrl-odv:28047] Regarding The Filing of Comments to RM-11828 By An ARRL Employee Howard All Board Members — Directors and Vice-Directors — are prohibited from filing individual comments on FCC petitions filed or supported by the League. To my knowledge, the Board has not authorized employees to make such filings. In light of the foregoing, would you be so kind as to please explain Mr. Fusaro's most recent filing in connection with RM-11828? Thanks. ______________________________________ John Robert Stratton N5AUS Director Legislative Director West Gulf Division Office: 512-445-6262 Cell: 512-426-2028 P.O. Box 2232 Austin, Texas 78768-2232 ______________________________________ [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv -- Ria Jairam, N2RJ Director, Hudson Division ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™ +1.973.594.6275 https://hudson.arrl.org n2rj@arrl.org<mailto:n2rj@arrl.org> -- Howard E. Michel, WB2ITX Chief Executive Officer ARRL, The National Association for Amateur Radio® 225 Main Street, Newington, CT 06111-1494 USA Telephone: +1 860-594-0404 email: hmichel@arrl.org<mailto:hmichel@arrl.org>