I agree with everyone who's posted so far that this is a great idea. Like many such ideas, it is obvious, once someone has thought of it. Thanks, Brian! While we all applaud this concept, we could easily strangle it (and ourselves!) if we were to field it without a clear, and clearly communicated, idea of our purpose, and some definite plans about who should respond to what, as users begin to warm to the idea. Are the forums a place for peer-to-peer communication without any guarantee of action, or, whether the Board intends it so or not, will users expect responses, and from whom? Do posts need to be moderated; can we assume that they will all be suitable for public consumption? If moderated, who does so, and what are the criteria? If a post asks a question, who should handle the response? Is a response is expected/ required? Is there a criterion for response timeliness? I think this is a good idea. We need to spell out explicitly how we intend to handle it before we release it. 73, Greg, K0GW On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Brian Mileshosky <n5zgt@swcp.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone --****
** **
An idea...****
** **
As we know, members always like being invited to share their thoughts on matters related to their organization. ARRL has the frequent QuickStats poll ( http://www.arrl.org/news/new-quickstats-poll-now-available-on-arrl-website-2...) that I don't think is meant purely for entertainment purposes, and major topics such as the past Regulation by Bandwidth have had unique calls for member input, along with a mechanism to provide that input (special email address).****
** **
ARRL's website has contained a web forum for a while now. How about a devoted "flash poll" section where, for perhaps 72 hours or a week each month, a "What are your thoughts about (insert specific ARRL operations topic, position, or upcoming agenda item here)?" question is opened briefly for member input, and then closed? Seems like an easy way to collect a bunch of opinions, ideas, and constructive criticism quickly, gather an idea of how the membership sides on certain topics, and -- most importantly -- give the membership an additional sense that their input is valued and wanted.****
** **
Of course there will be some posts that lean far on both sides of any topic. That's unavoidable, but not a compelling reason to avoid using our web forum for this purpose. The risk of public constructive criticism isn't either. Like eHam.net product reviews, one can quickly identify an average position/opinion of that particular product based on the range of posts. That's valuable, and the same would be true in an ARRL poll.****
** **
One idea, to really get this out there, would be to open this poll during the same time-frame of each month, and advertise the poll and topic in a small table within QST. That way it's promoted with consistency, and available for input consistently. And the beauty is that only ARRL members can post within ARRL forums. Posters are known by callsign, and non-member haters wouldn't be able to dust things up.****
** **
Seems like a win-win to me: ARRL leadership and staff gains a great deal of ideas and opinions to important topics, and members get the satisfaction of being called to action to openly opine on subjects related to their organization. And the mechanism to make this happen already exists.****
** **
Your thoughts?****
** **
73,****
Brian N5ZGT****
ARRL Director, Rocky Mountain Division****
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv