Repeater journals make enough off of membership fees, ex: $20-30 per year, so I would prefer data sent straight to ARRL for more accurate reporting. Might generate more ARRL membership if individual owners sent their repeater data in. Jim Millsap Southeastern Vice-Director Sent from my iPhone-Jim Millsap On Nov 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, G Widin <gpwidin@comcast.net> wrote:
I should perhaps clarify that my reply to Dave's original note assumed that those currently receiving the $ for submitting repeater info would likely not be mollified by the provision to pay them if correct data are received. 73, Greg
_______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org http://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv