All:
I now understand that Director Jairam may not be able to identify other participants in ODjr as it is a closed list with participation determined by the moderator that conditions participation on not disclosing other participants. If I have put her in an an untenable situation that was not my intent.
If my prior assumptions re ODjr are incorrect the moderator of ODjr can correct me since he is a Board member with access to ODV.
In an effort to move toward full discussion and a Board that is better prepared to address issues at the July Board meeting, participants in ODjr can advise the ODV of their respective comments to ODjr , since such self disclosure would their future participation in ODjr.
The call for full and open disclosure and discussion was a key to the concerns loudly raised last year. This is an opportunity to show it is a continuing commitment.
73,
Jay
Director Jairam:I must admit In 22 years in the ARRL board I have not heard of ODjr and have not been privy to this private talk group. Certainly Officers, Directors and Vice Directors do speak with one another from time time, but the use of on-going self-selected formal small groups in lieu of OD and ODV is something new.If there was a problem with ODV and ODjr was employed temporarily it was not intended to be used to the exclusion of OD or ODV.Had there had been any significant discussion on OD or ODV in the past 5 and 1/2 months rather than apparently relying on private discussions among a subset of board members there may not have been a need to ask these questions.It is unclear how use of a private exchange such as ODjr will build trust and a greater level of cooperation on the Board. Again, please be kind enough to bring the rest of the board up to speed by sharing the ODjr postings and letting us know those board members who prefer to use this private exchange (ODjr) rather than sharing thoughts with fellow Officers, Directors and Vice Directors. The New York Times uses a phrase that is appropriate here “Truth dies in darkness”.I don’t have a “beef” only some questions related to good governance. Please look at the the last half of my prior email, specifically the paragraphs restated following my signature lineThese questions and concerns are raised in good faith and I trust you will be willing to respond to the questions in the same vein.73,Jay, K0QBPrior unanswered questions and concerns follow:******************************************************A major topic in the last election cycle, and a concern by some Board members, including some then VD’s, was that the entire board was not privy to information and the appropriate level of transparency to which Board members and their ARRL members were entitled.
It now appears there is a separate reflector (ODjr@lists.kkn.net) being used by a subset of the Directors in place of the OD reflector. Use of such a private listserv for what appears to be a self-selected group of Directors would be wholly inconsistent with the call for more transparency and the concept of the board acting for the benefit of all ARRL members after full and fair discussion.
We are less than a month from the July Board Meeting. In the five plus months since the new board staked out a new direction for governance, legislative actions and transparency there has been precious little information provided through OD and ODV as to how these initiatives are progressing. Though full reports will be provided in Board reports, but some interim updates would be beneficial and would allow for a better informed an prepared Board.
In the spirit of transparency and to permit all Directors the opportunity to fully engage their members in the short time before the July Board Meeting, the Directors (and any others) who are on ODjr@list.kkn.net should provide all Officers and Directors, as well as Vice Directors if appropriate, with all of the postings to ODjr@lists.kkn.net.
In the further spirit the of transparency and to better provide a feeling of trust, understanding and cooperation among the ARRL Board, the members of ODjr@lists.kkn.net should identify themselves and articulate the reason for using an “offlne” reflector rather than the OD or ODV reflector that ARRL boards have used for decades to share information and discuss issues.
****************************************((((
Sent from my iPadJay,Maybe you need to jog your memory a little. ODjr was around a long time and according to ODV email archives it was offered to the board to get around gmail incompatibility. It stuck around I guess.Either way, having private conversations with other directors is really not unusual. Some things are best discussed with a small group and then put to a wider audience. Formally we do this with committees. Informally we talk amongst ourselves.If you oppose other directors talking amongst themselves privately I don’t know what to tell you.If you really are concerned about transparency, why not start with the E&E and righting some of the wrongs. What about when it was said that if one director lost his seat that an individual contracted by the ARRL said he would make the board’s life a living hell. What about a (past) director taking campaign donations from an ARRL lobbyist? I have more but you get the point.We have bigger fish to fry right now. Let’s not get caught up in this nonsense.PS - ODjr largely remains quiet and I do not discuss much of anything there. And often I put out a post on ODV only to get silence.What’s your beef?73RiaN2RJOn Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 10:45 PM John Bellows <jbellows@skypoint.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Yesterday I received OD28239 Re: [ODjr] Metrics and Engagement. That OD message referenced a message from a different Director on a mailing list I had never heard back fl namely, ODjr@lists.kkn.net.
The traffic on the OD reflector provided for discussion by ARRL Officers and all Directors has been remarkably light since the new Board took office in January. The lack of discussion has been a concern a was raised at the recent EC meeting.
A major topic in the last election cycle, and a concern by some Board members, including some then VD’s, was that the entire board was not privy to information and the appropriate level of transparency to which Board members and their ARRL members were entitled.
It now appears there is a separate reflector (ODjr@lists.kkn.net) being used by a subset of the Directors in place of the OD reflector. Use of such a private listserv for what appears to be a self-selected group of Directors would be wholly inconsistent with the call for more transparency and the concept of the board acting for the benefit of all ARRL members after full and fair discussion.
We are less than a month from the July Board Meeting. In the five plus months since the new board staked out a new direction for governance, legislative actions and transparency there has been precious little information provided through OD and ODV as to how these initiatives are progressing. Though full reports will be provided in Board reports, but some interim updates would be beneficial and would allow for a better informed an prepared Board.
In the spirit of transparency and to permit all Directors the opportunity to fully engage their members in the short time before the July Board Meeting, the Directors (and any others) who are on ODjr@list.kkn.net should provide all Officers and Directors, as well as Vice Directors if appropriate, with all of the postings to ODjr@lists.kkn.net.
In the further spirit the of transparency and to better provide a feeling of trust, understanding and cooperation among the ARRL Board, the members of ODjr@lists.kkn.net should identify themselves and articulate the reason for using an “offlne” reflector rather than the OD or ODV reflector that ARRL boards have used for decades to share information and discuss issues.
73,
Jay, K0QB
Sent from my iPad
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv