Also we are working on an FAQ highlight these very points, which should be available next week.

Thanks, Dan. 

73
Rick - K5UR

 ...


-----Original Message-----
From: Henderson, Dan N1ND <dhenderson@arrl.org>
To: Williams, Dale, WA8EFK, WA8EFK <dale.wms1@frontier.com>; arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>; Boehner, James, N2ZZ, N2ZZ <jboehner01@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wed, Mar 7, 2018 10:11 am
Subject: [arrl-odv:27110] Re: Expanded Technician Class Privilege Proposal

Please forgive me answering this to the whole list.

We are already working on this. I understand this will be the editorial in the next QST. Also we are working on an FAQ highlight these very points, which should be available next week.



Dan Henderson, N1ND
Assistant Secretary, the American Radio Relay League, Inc.
Regulatory Information Manager
ARRL - the national association for Amateur Radio
Phone: 860-594-0236
________________________________________
From: arrl-odv [arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] on behalf of Williams, Dale, WA8EFK
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 11:04 AM
To: arrl-odv; Boehner, James, N2ZZ
Subject: [arrl-odv:27109] Re: Expanded Technician Class Privilege Proposal

I also have received complaining e-mails and have spent a few hours responding to them and defending our position. We do need to take immediate action as Jim suggests.

73,

Dale WA8EFK



On 3/7/2018 10:40 AM, James F. Boehner, MD via arrl-odv wrote:
In regards to the news story on the above topic:

http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-requests-expanded-hf-privileges-for-technician-licensees

I have recently received numerous “angry” e-mails from members who are against Technicians getting expanded privileges, perhaps thinking that this is a further “dumbing down” of amateur radio.

The fact is, the news story did not immediately indicate the processes of the Entry Level License Committee. The intent was to create an entry level license that would attract young, technically minded youth into amateur radio, similar to the foundation license in the UK and Australia. The initial emphasis should have indicated that if we do not attract youth in our hobby, the service will die out as we do, and there would be no legacy to be left.

Then, the practicality of the entry level license should have been discussed, that the FCC dropped us down to 3 license classes, and it would be unlikely that they would ever create another license class. Therefore, the current Technician license was chosen to be the vehicle of the Entry License. To that end, we needed privileges that would give newcomers a true “taste” of amateur radio, which required additional HF privileges, and modification of the exam.

All of this, including the extensive surveys were discussed later in the article, but I doubt many read anything after the first paragraph.

I would request that we have a follow-up article that describes the processes and original intent of the Entry License Committee, in order to diffuse some of these very negative impressions.

On a positive side, I hear CQ actually agrees with us on this issue.


’73 de JIM N2ZZ
Director – Roanoke Division
Representing ARRL members in the Virginia, West Virginia, South Carolina and North Carolina sections
ARRL – The National Association for Amateur Radio™




_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org<mailto:arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv


_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv