Tom -- An ARRL-affiliated organization called Rocky Mountain Ham Radio (RMHAM) has built, operates, and maintains a multi-megabit, IP-based microwave network that operates entirely on Part 97 spectrum, principally 5 GHz. This Mikrotik based network spans -- tied completely via Part 97 RF, except for a couple hops that are partially installed -- from Cheyenne, Wyoming all the way down to Albuquerque, New Mexico. It will eventually go as far south as El Paso, Texas. Hung off the network are over 30 DMR, All-Star, and D-STAR repeaters that RMHAM operates or ties in for other clubs. Nearly any IP-based application that's legal for use on Part 97 spectrum can be facilitated across the network. It's been utilized for a number of public service and emergency events. The network functions independently from the internet, though we do have internet taps as a matter of convenience for network monitoring (Observium, Cacti, etc), for temporary fail-over purposes if ever needed, and for a couple applications like D-STAR which need to touch servers on the internet. If you'd like more details, Vice Director Jeff Ryan and I serve on RMHAM's leadership team. Dwayne is also part of the organization. RMHAM's website is https://www.rmham.org/wordpress/ We'd be happy to help ARRL craft the narrative. 73, Brian N5ZGT On 2017-01-24 15:36, Gallagher, Tom, NY2RF wrote:
Ladies & Gentlemen:
At yesterday's House Session, immediately before HR 555 was
passed, the House of Representatives passed HR 588, SECURING ACCESS TO NETWORKS IN DISASTERS ACT. The bill provides funding to the FCC to study ways to improve the reestablishment of broadband networks specifically following a natural disaster. https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr588/BILLS-115hr588ih.xml [2]. Since disaster communications is part of our world, I draw your attention to the proposed bill for several reasons.
1. ARRL ought to be a
natural candidate for participating in the study by the FCC which the bill is funding. Our subject matter expertise would enhance any research. In addition, we ought to claim a seat at the table merely to oversee our own interest here.
2. There will undoubtedly be
funding via grants or RFP's since no government agency actually performs this kind of work: it's delegated to contractors. I believe ARRL's Lab might be a qualified contractor. As Frank McCarthy points out: we're better known now in Congress.
3. The Amateur Radio community
already has some practical experience in building pop-up broadband networks using 2.4 MHz and higher devices. ARRL author, Glen Popiel, KW5GP published the definitive handbook on amateur mesh networks as recently as April 2016.
4. Emergency and disaster communications
is quickly evolving away from analog voice to high speed data, as the sponsor of this bill has made clear, and participation in the process would enable us to keep pace with the changes.
5. And finally, the
development of self-contained, plug and play, readily available and reliable HSMM-capable equipment from vendors like Ubiquiti has accelerated over the last two years and driven down the cost of creating these networks on a large scale. It is much easier and cheaper to create a HSMM mesh node than even three years ago.
For these reasons, I
have asked ARRL Laboratory manager, Ed Hare to evaluate on a preliminary basis the role which ARRL might play in the FCC research project and to enlist the assistance of Lab volunteer, Martin Ewing, AA6E. Dr. Ewing's experience with IT networks at Yale's Astronomy Department and his familiarity with grant applications would be helpful. I've asked Ed to report back his preliminary recommendations by next month's end. When they are available I will share them with you.
By way of history,
HSMM mesh has been suggested before as a network resiliency aid several years ago following Hurricane Sandy when New York City experienced wide-spread failure of commercial broadband networks. At the time, Senator Ron Wyden (D. OR) suggested that a National High Tech Response Team be created to deal with these kinds of failures. His initiative was publicized in _The Wall Street Journal_ OP-ED on 11/27/12 entitled "Time for A High Tech Version of the National Guard" http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323330604578143073045710876 [3] to which I responded, and the Journal also published, that we already have a high tech response team: 700,000 hams http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323901604578157180648688160 [4].
Wyden's proposal didn't get much traction from Congress or
the administration at the time, but it appears with the passage of HR 588 that interest has been rekindled. This would appear to be an opportunity.
Gallagher 1/24/17
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv [1] Links: ------ [1] https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv [2] https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr588/BILLS-115hr588ih.xml [3] http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323330604578143073045710876 [4] http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323901604578157180648688160