Well, Marty, you have to focus on the operative term of the letter, which is at the end of the third paragraph:
"Until such time as compelling, peer-reviewed scientific research is presented that denotes significant risks associated with
the use of amateur radios, two-way radios, or other communications devices, the NSC does not support legislative bans
or prohibition on their use."
That is a lot further than I expected them to go. Surely you can't expect the President and CEO of the NSC to not cover herself after giving an answer like that. The suggestion that amateur mobile operation should be confined to emergency communications during
disasters is a suggestion for our own best practices document that they recommend.
I think the letter is a home run for us, frankly.
73, Chris W3KD
Christopher D. Imlay
Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper. P.C.
14356 Cape May Road
Silver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011
(301) 384-5525 telephone
(301) 384-6384 facsimile
W3KD@ARRL.ORG
-----Original Message-----
From: Marty Woll <n6vi@socal.rr.com>
To: arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org>
Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2009 2:45 am
Subject: [arrl-odv:18077] Re:National Safety Council reply
Hi, Joel.
While I'm pleased to learn that NSC is not looking to promote laws prohibiting Amateur Radio mobile operation any time soon, I'm not sure that discouraging mobile operation other than in "disaster emergencies" is consistent with our - or at least my constituents' - position on the use of Amateur equipment while driving. Some people can multi-task well and others cannot. A blanket policy along the lines suggested by Ms. Froetscher is, IMHO, not a suitable substitute for the exercise of individual judgment and would be inapproriate.
73,
Marty N6VI
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:18 PM
Subject: FW: National Safety Council reply