I’ve also been told what Mike says below. But I haven’t seen a final copy of the law yet. So far, I haven’t seen such an exemption for MA hams or FCC-licensed individuals. Nonetheless, it does include:
(b) Evidence that the use of a mobile electronic device was in response to an emergency shall be an affirmative defense to an alleged violation of this section. For the purposes of this section, an emergency shall mean that the operator needed to report that: (i) the vehicle was disabled; (ii) medical attention or assistance was required; (iii) police intervention, fire department or other emergency services were necessary for the personal safety of the operator or a passenger or to otherwise ensure the safety of the public; or (iv) a disabled vehicle or an accident was present on a roadway.
Again, however, H4203 is not the law as passed. It is the bill that went into the final day or two before passage. Short answer: I have more to learn.
Fred Hopengarten, Esq. K1VR
Six Willarch Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
781.259.0088, k1vr@arrl.org
New England Director
Serving ME, NH, VT, MA, RI and CT
From: arrl-odv [mailto:arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] On Behalf Of Mike Raisbeck via arrl-odv
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 9:54 PM
To: rjairam@gmail.com; arrl-odv@arrl.org
Subject: [arrl-odv:29033] Re: MA cell phone bill
We're well aware. There is apparently an exemption for services licensed by the FCC
Mike
k1twf
Mike Raisbeck
k1twf@arrl.net
-----Original Message-----
From: rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com>
To: ODV <arrl-odv@arrl.org>
Sent: Thu, Nov 28, 2019 9:18 pm
Subject: [arrl-odv:29032] MA cell phone bill
A new one was signed yesterday in Mass.
Perhaps Fred or Mike Raisbeck could shed some light on this, as to whether it affects amateur radio?
73
Ria, N2RJ
_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv