That was before WI-FI and HSMM got real popular. How times change, exactly the reason our proposal needs to be taken seriously. I believe as Joel and others have mentioned, that you can find a way to make 3 Khz. work. The 6 Khz. Request would be contributing to a waste of valuable spectrum, a valuable commodity to us all. Let them use VHF/UHF for those needs. It is indeed difficult to please everyone.

 

Dave, I wonder if you had your chat with Art Bell last week? Any chance you got him to understand?

 

 

73, Dick

 

Dick Mondro, W8FQT w8fqt@arrl.org

Vice Director, ARRL Great Lakes Division

http://greatlakes.arrl.org

 


From: Sumner, Dave, K1ZZ [mailto:dsumner@arrl.org]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:21 AM
To: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:12306] Re: odv:12281] 3KHz Wide Digital

 

A couple of years ago at Dayton, John, K8OCL made a pitch to Paul Rinaldo and me for 200 kHz(!) digital bandwidth.

 

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: k8je@earthlink.net Mail Account [mailto:k8je@arrl.net]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 11:48 PM
To: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:12296] Re: odv:12281] 3KHz Wide Digital

Re:  Coy’s comment about the inadequacy of 3 kHz regarding digital on HF.

 

My digital experts (K8OCL, et al) also told me 3 kHz would provide no meaningful benefit.

 

Jim W.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005