I would like to second Tom's suggestion here. I think we
need to go
public here and I do not see any downside from this action.
But I do
think there could be a downside if we do not take a position;
our
members expect it. Even if we think the bill is going to go
nowhere,
which I hope it will, I think we need to be on the record as
opposing
this bill.
Frank...N2FF.....
Tom Frenaye
wrote:
>
>I also believe we have a lot of members who find our
association with the NWS to be very positive (and vice versa). I
think it'd be a good move for us to publicly state that we do not support
S.786.
>
>
--
Tom
>
>
>