Good question. My sense about the level of member support
for this is from the folks who approach me at meetings and hamfests. I have no definitive data. When I receive comments they most typically
indicate the person is confused, at best.
The second most prevalent comment is that they don’t want things
to be messed with. The comments
from pro-change folks is far down the list.
Jim Weaver, K8JE
Director, Great Lakes
Division ARRL; http://www.arrl.org/
5065 Bethany Rd., Mason,
OH 45040
Tel.: 513-459-0142;
E-mail: k8je@arrl.org
ARRL:
The reason Amateur Radio Is!
MEMBERS:
The reason ARRL Is!
-----Original Message-----
From: arrl-odv@arrl.org
[mailto:arrl-odv@arrl.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005
12:26 AM
To: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:12126] Re: The
EC Allocation by Bandwidth Proposal
Jim:
What do you base the comment on
below?
I'm getting very few comments about
the proposal and those few that I have gotten are by far in favor of it.
73,
K5UR
In a message dated 4/20/2005
10:39:50 PM Central Standard Time, arrl-odv@arrl.org writes:
I have to admit there seem to be relatively few members who are ready to accept the basics of our band plan proposal at this time.