Just off the wall, but it seems as though this is resembles an eminent domain "taking" and unjust enrichment of a class to the unjust detriment of those affected.

Why can't our attorneys qualify a class for amateur licensees affected - all of us - and get us paid a few bucks for the loss of all this valuable spectrum? If this were land, they could take it, but they'd need to pay the unimproved price to the owners and even leaseholders.

Obviously, I'm not an attorney, but eminent domain compensations have made many wealthy people out of displaced property owners. Is there statute that prohibits this? Why is this $27B not benefiting those who are impacted? Unjust enrichment, I'd say.

Mickey Baker, N4MB
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
“The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead." Robert K. Greenleaf

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 9:44 AM John Robert Stratton <N5AUS@n5aus.com> wrote:

3.45 GHz Auction

See:

https://telecoms.com/512971/att-spent-big-in-us-3-45-ghz-auction-with-dish-not-far-behind/

_______________________________________

John Robert Stratton

N5AUS

Director

West Gulf Division

Office: 512-445-6262

Cell: 512-426-2028

P.O. Box 2232

Austin, Texas 78768-2232

_______________________________________

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv