My point was two-fold: I believe it is generally better to have the facts first. Secondly, assuming there was a violation of staff policy, though that has not been established, this would be a personnel and administrative matter.

If it should subsequently be determined that there is a need for a policy change the Board may desire to act.

I believe this approach is consistent with the approach set forth in the Guidebook for Directors of Nonprofit Corporations previously distributed to all members of the Board.

73,

Jay, KØQB

From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of rjairam@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 2:14 PM
To: jbellows@skypoint.com
Cc: arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
Subject: [arrl-odv:28049] Re: Regarding The Filing of Comments to RM-11828 By An ARRL Employee

Generally as a condition of employment in my experience, public statements concerning an employer by employees is restricted as a matter of policy since it could be interpreted as an official statement from the company. 

It also directly correlated to the position one holds. IIRC, Fusaro’s title is “director of operations.” As such public statements concerning ARRL policy or FCC petitions could be interpreted as being the opinion of the ARRL as it comes from a senior manager with the title “director.” That’s the major problem I have with it. 

As for the venue, it is what it is. I think bringing this to the board and asking the CEO to address the board on this is entirely appropriate as the comment concerns a public action.

73

Ria

N2RJ

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:36 PM <jbellows@skypoint.com> wrote:

If the question was truly for CEO Michel it is interesting that you chose to address it on ODV rather than directly with him.

Are asking if an ARRL employee is precluded from expressing his or her views in an FCC individual comment to a Rule Making proceeding as a condition of employment or suggesting an ARRL employee may only comment if permitted by the ARRL Board?

Jay, KØQB

From: arrl-odv <arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org> On Behalf Of John Robert Stratton
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 12:51 PM
To: arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org; Michel, Howard, WB2ITX (CEO) <wb2itx@arrl.org>
Subject: [arrl-odv:28047] Regarding The Filing of Comments to RM-11828 By An ARRL Employee

Howard

    All Board Members — Directors and Vice-Directors — are prohibited from filing individual comments on FCC petitions filed or supported by the League. To my knowledge, the Board has not authorized employees to make such filings.

    In light of the foregoing, would you be so kind as to please explain Mr. Fusaro's most recent filing in connection with RM-11828?

    Thanks.

______________________________________

John Robert Stratton

N5AUS

Director

Legislative Director

West Gulf Division

Office:                     512-445-6262

Cell:                         512-426-2028

P.O. Box 2232

Austin, Texas 78768-2232

______________________________________

Virus-free. www.avg.com

_______________________________________________
arrl-odv mailing list
arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org
https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv

--

Ria Jairam, N2RJ
Director, Hudson Division
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™
+1.973.594.6275
https://hudson.arrl.org
n2rj@arrl.org