In the Discussion of motion "Frenaye #2" from the July Board meeting, it says:

This statement is incorrect.  As the chronology below indicates, I replied immediately to K1KI both in January and June.  In addition, his January e-mail was forwarded to the committee immediately in January and resulted in extended discussion, several messages of which we also forwarded to K1KI.

Per Minute 34, we will ensure that the Logbook Study Committee visits the topic of callsign matching again, and generates useful guidance to users. 

However, it is not true, as Frenaye claims, that I and the LSC did not consider or respond to his e-mails.  I have asked Mr. Frenaye to clarify this to the Board, but since he apparently will not do so, I must correct the false accusation in his motion.
73,

         Greg, K0GW
___________________________________________________________________

e-mail chronology.  Dates are 2017.

Jan 14 9:15 PM--Frenaye to Widin--Message attached to Frenaye #2

Jan 15 7:14 AM--Widin to Frenaye, CC: Logbook Study Committee--Reply

Jan 15 2:14 PM--Bernstein to Widin and Frenaye, CC: Logbook Study Committee--Discussion

Jan 16 8:54 AM--Widin to Frenaye--Copy of response from Keane

Jun 30 11:54 AM--Frenaye to Widin--Never heard back in January

Jun 30 2:23 PM--Widin to Frenaye--Reply and summary of January conclusions

Jul 26 11:34 AM--Widin to Frenaye--Responses did occur in January

[other January copies re-sent to Frenaye]

Jul 29 4:15 PM--Frenaye to Widin--Help doc'n on LoTW too brief

Jul 29 5:52 PM--Widin to Frenaye--Please correct no-response allegation in Frenaye #2.