Bob:
I believe your memory in this situation is incorrect. The Board did not do away with the policy. At Minute 34 of the July, 2014 meeting the Board decided:
34. On motion of Mr. Rehman,seconded by Dr. Boehner, it was VOTED that
Division Directors will have the option of having emails to their entire Division or a subset thereof held for review or automatically and immediately sent without being held. Each Director will
be able to change their preference at any time electronically.
The purpose of this motion, as I understood it, was to provide those Directors who wished, a facility to immediately release e-mails to their respective Divisions while others, if they wished, could continue to have their e-mails reviewed and released. In response
to this motion, staff added a "check box" on the e-mail page to provide each individual Director the choice of having immediate release for each e-mail sent.
I will have staff review our procedures to insure timely release of those e-mails where the Director indicates his preference to have it reviewed.
73,
Barry J. Shelley, N1VXY
Chief Financial Officer
ARRL, Inc.
From: arrl-odv [arrl-odv-bounces@reflector.arrl.org] on behalf of Vallio, Bob, W6RGG
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 7:09 PM
To: Rick Roderick
Cc: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:25702] Re: Leadership - The Amateur Radio Parity Act
Thanks for your note, Rick. I sent my Division mailing to HQ yesterday,
and had it not been for the good work of Steve Ewald today, it would still be sitting in the queue at HQ, waiting for approval. That is totally unacceptable to me, especially inasmuch as I understood that the outdated policy of Director mailing needing
HQ approval had been done away with some time ago. Does anyone know why this change was implemented?
Bob Vallio, W6RGG