Hello Riley - Thank you, explaining that it was a sampling would quell the complaint from SM's that "nobody asked me". 73, Kermit On Friday, April 20, 2018, 6:55:50 AM CDT, RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH <rilepatholling@comcast.net> wrote: Yes--it was a sampling. Brian called a group and I did as well. I think I called 8 or so. But we should have indicated it was a sampling. On April 17, 2018 at 3:41 PM Kermit Carlson <w9xa@yahoo.com> wrote: Hello Rick, Riley et al; I think it is time to start accepting new OOC's and OO's with the understandingthat the program is in transition. The emphasis should be on OOC's since we have had a significant amount of OOC applications from Section Managers that are now over two years old since the hold was put into place - and the SM's could really use the help. One other slightly related issue is that at one point the PSWEG or someonehad mentioned that the SM community would be contacted for input - I have taken some heatjust recently that it appears that the SM's were not contacted. Either that or only a sampling wascontacted....can someone let me know which. On a related topic - there has been some comments about the Boardabandoning the NTS with no action..... we need to get the OO/OOC program back online,tackle the NTS issue and move on. If we do get a re-tooling of the FCC Auxillary functionthat would be perfect, but we need to stop doing nothing. 73, Kermit W9XA On Tuesday, April 17, 2018, 1:06:51 PM CDT, Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: I think we need to move on this pronto. Riley, as soon as you check with your team, assuming they agree, then let's turn the field loose on the appointments. Further, I think Brain sent the email out to the SM's last year, maybe the OO/OOC's, too. I don't recall for sure. I think it would be good for the field to see Riley's name on the next one. Seems that would be a shot in the arm to the OO/OOC corp to see Riley Hollingsworth's name. But, we have to be careful in managing unrealistic expectations as we still have the same problems with FCC. Riley, I talked to Barry and he and his team will help you and the OO Study Comm to craft a message. 73Rick - K5UR ... -----Original Message----- From: RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH <rilepatholling@comcast.net> To: Christopher Imlay <w3kd.arrl@gmail.com> Cc: Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv, K5UR via arrl-odv <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> Sent: Tue, Apr 17, 2018 12:33 pm Subject: [arrl-odv:27178] Re: OO Program Study Committee I wasn't going to make a decision unilaterally. I'll defer to the committee, but Jim Boehner needs to appoint some right now and I don't think he should have to wait. On April 17, 2018 at 11:40 AM Christopher Imlay <w3kd.arrl@gmail.com> wrote: Riley, I realize that the work of the OO Committee has taken far longer than it should have and that has been a source of frustration to the members of the OO Revitalization Committee (as I have been calling it), including Dan Henderson, me, and I dare say, you too. As can be seen from the Comments from ODV, on your suggestion, there is a great deal of frustration with the inordinate delay in launching the new program, all of it justified. This new program should have been in place a year ago, as I see it. That was FCC's anticipation as well. However, restarting OO appointments under the old program now, when we have about 700 people on the rolls already (which everyone, including FCC agree is far too many) and a plan on the verge of execution to seriously reduce the aggregate number of OOs nationwide in the near term to a far lower number of vetted, trained OOs, creates very practical problems of volunteer management and expectations that stand to derail the entire revitalization plan and necessitate suspending OO appointments twice. I hope that the OO Committee members can discuss this further before you make a decision to do this. I note also that the status of the OO Revitalization program is on the agenda for this weekend's EC meeting and that President Roderick has asked that you participate in that part of the meeting by telephone. Could we bat this around before you make any decisions, either within the OO Revitalization Committee (which hasn't had a meeting since the Board meeting) or the EC this weekend? 73, Chris W3KD On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:54 AM, RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH <rilepatholling@comcast.net> wrote: Does anyone have any objection to resuming the appointment of OO's as needed, until the FCC meets with us on the new agreement? That will probably be within a few months, i.e., as soon as they get out the three major cases they are working on now in our service. I recommend that we resume the appointments. On April 5, 2018 at 2:16 PM "Roderick, Rick, K5UR via arrl-odv" <arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org> wrote: Hi gang: I’ve appointed Riley Hollingsworth, K4ZDH, as Chair of the OOProgram Study Committee to replace Brian who is rolling off. I’ve alsoappointed Bob Vallio to serve on the Committee. I appreciate Riley stepping up to the plate to take thereins. 73Rick – K5UR ...______________________________ _________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/ mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv ______________________________ _________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/ mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv -- Christopher D. ImlayBooth, Freret & Imlay, LLC14356 Cape May RoadSilver Spring, Maryland 20904-6011(301) 384-5525 telephone(301) 384-6384 facsimileW3KD@ARRL.ORG _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv _______________________________________________ arrl-odv mailing list arrl-odv@reflector.arrl.org https://reflector.arrl.org/mailman/listinfo/arrl-odv