Well, just in case he busted someone's address...... Are we close to having our comments on this to the FCC ready? So those who choose to reply to Mr. Doolos can at least sound like we have a common and unified approach? Mark, HDX ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Cathy and John Doolos <cdoolos@centurylink.net> Date: Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:06 PM Subject: Proposed Application Fees for Radio Amateurs To: <k5ur@arrl.org>, <k1twf@arrl.org>, <w6rgg@arrl.org>, <w6rod@arrl.org>, < w9xa@arrl.org>, <k0bbc@arrl.org>, <k5uz@arrl.org>, <wa8efk@arrl.org>, < n2rj@arrl.org>, <k0das@arrl.org>, <k1vr@arrl.org>, <w7vo@arrl.org>, < k6jaty@arrl.org>, <w2ru@arrl.org>, <k0rm@arrl.org>, <nwmb@arrl.org>, < n6aa@arrl.org>, <n5aus@arrl.org> Cc: <k3rf@arrl.org>, <k9la@arrl.org>, <w0nd@arrl.org>, <wb4rhq@arrl.org>, < w8wtd@arrl.org>, <w2und@arrl.org>, <k0alz@arrl.org>, <kb7hdx@arrl.org>, < k6wex@arrl.org>, <n2cop@arrl.org>, <noesq@arrl.org>, <kg4jsz@arrl.org>, < aa7a@arrl.org>, <lcooper@arrl.org> ARRL Board of Directors, Are you going to oppose the FCC proposed application fees for radio amateurs or will you support imposing fees on radio amateurs? I ask this because some of you, a majority threw the amateur radio community "under the bus" when you killed the Amateur Radio Parity Act. Then you did not have the professional courtesy to tell the Amateur Radio community, which provided overwhelming support for your every request, why you killed the best chance we had to get some level of relief from antenna restrictions in communities with restrictive covenants. You need to keep in mind that the only reason the ARRL exists and you are on the Board of Directors is because of the Amateur Radio operators! John WB5EVF