Let me provide some history, just for background; it’s a
new day and what happened in the past doesn’t tell us what’s right
now and for the future.
The Board created an Emergency Communications Advisory Committee
(ECAC) in January 1973. In those days, advisory committees were organized on
the basis of call area rather than by division. The initial committee
appointments were announced in October 1973 QST. (By the way, in April 1973
QST, pages 72 and 73, you will find observations by George Hart, W1NJM, some of
which relate to issues we are still grappling with today.)
At the 1987 Second Board Meeting the ECAC was renamed the Public
Service Advisory Committee and its scope was expanded to include non-emergency
traffic handling and other public service communications.
At the 1998 Annual Board Meeting the PSAC, having become
moribund, was disbanded.
Dave K1ZZ
From: Mickey Cox
[mailto:mcoxk5mc@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:37 AM
To: arrl-odv
Subject: [arrl-odv:17815] EmComm Advisory Committee?
ODV,
I've pasted
below some comments I recently received from K4CJX. Steve is an Assistant
Director for the Delta Division and he is, no doubt, very enthusiastic (and
sometimes sarcastic!) in expressing his opinions. However, I believe
Steve is essentially correct in his observation that we (the BOD) should do
more to show our support of emergency communications.
One
suggestion I want to throw out to the ODV is the creation of an EmComm Advisory
Committee similar in structure to the three existing advisory committees (the
DXAC, CAC, and VUAC). I enjoy chasing DX and playing in some of the
contests, but I believe practically all of us would agree that EmComm is at
least as important, if not more so. The creation of such an advisory
committee would help signal to the membership that the BOD is very serious
about emergency communications. More importantly, however, I
think the advice that the Board would receive from the EmComm experts who would
serve on the committee would be quite valuable.
I have
discussed this topic with a number of Delta Division folks (particularly the
Section Managers and Assistant Directors) and they agree that the BOD should
have an EmComm Advisory Committee equivalent in stature to
the DXAC, CAC, and VUAC.
Thanks and
73,
Mickey K5MC
Mickey,
This After Action Report obviously is NOT for publication, although it is
the one report I can release. What it does illustrate is that not all
communications resources consider Winlink 2000 a "lightning
rod," a term used by one of our ARRL senior staff. That negative
connotation is reserved for the naysayers on QRZ forums, and their
followers on the ARRL staff and, unfortunately, certain members of
the ARRL Board of Directors. After all, look at the push for EmComm by
the ARRL during Dayton Hamvention. Right on target.
Attached is one of the agencies involving Winlink 2000 during DICE
09. Much use of Winlink 2000 was involved on the Amateur side as well,
especially in South Texas, but, "we certainly don't want to start any
negative momentum," so let's keep all that on the QT.
I still have July, 2004, minute 21 in mind, and how the Staff
jumped right on top of their mandate. Fascinating how they evade BOD
actions!
On a personal note, I am sorry I could not get to Knoxville this
year to meet with you.
FYI ,
Steve